
Hugo Boss trademark challenge turned into PR nightmare
What happens when an internationally well-known luxury fashion house goes against a small family-owned Welsh brewery? As it turns out, a lot of unexpected things.
Section 2(e)(3) trademark refusal is issued if the USPTO examiner considers the mark to be geographically deceptively misdescriptive. For example, a brand called True Tuscan might be considered geographically deceptively misdescriptive if the goods are not manufactured in the region of Tuscany in Italy.
Not every brand containing a geographical term will be refused registration. Before delving into options to overcome this type of office action, we have to look at the criteria for its issuing. A mark is deemed geographically deceptively misdescriptive if:
To overcome a Section 2(e)(3) refusal, you'd have to challenge one of these points except point two - if you could prove your goods originate in the said location, that would still leave you with a Section 2(e)(2) refusal, this time for being "primarily geographically descriptive."
You can still build a legal case around one or more of the remaining three points, but generally speaking, it's challenging. Therefore, seeking the help of a qualified trademark attorney is highly recommended.
Does receiving an office action mean my trademark is denied?
Can I amend my trademark application in response to an office action?
How long does it take for the USPTO to review my response to an office action?
What is a suspension letter in context of trademark office actions?
Is there any other solution to an office action besides responding?
What does it mean if a trademark is 'published for oppositions'?
Our team of experienced trademark attorneys is here to help you! Simply send us an email outlining your request and we'll be happy to assist you.